Is mubi.com/en/users/5788446 Legit or a Scam? Trust Score 10

No significant risk indicators found in our automated checks.

Automated checks on September 22, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.

First analyzed Sep 22, 2026 · Updated Sep 22, 2026

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://mubi.com/en/users/5788446 Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose The analyzed page was the /en/users/5788446 path rather than the homepage, so this report is anchored to that specific page experience. The scraped title was Margeaux St.Croix - Ratings amp; Reviews - MUBI . The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: subscription-based streaming service. Visible on-page text referenced By clicking Accept All , you consent to our use of cookies. . The content appears aimed at film enthusiasts. In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with social media and user profiles characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The requested page path /en/users/5788446 was preserved during scraping, so this review reflects that specific page rather than a generic homepage substitute. The scraped title was Margeaux St.Croix - Ratings amp; Reviews - MUBI , which gives a direct signal about what the page presents to visitors. The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: subscription-based streaming service. The page appears aimed at film enthusiasts. Supplementary review also reached 1 internal page(s), which helped confirm policy/contact material beyond the first page. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were limited and policy signals were present . Additional observed context from the analysis included: The domain is 8812 days old, indicating a long-standing presence | The SSL certificate is valid, ensuring secure connections | The presence of SPF records indicates proper email authentication measures. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content appears commercially transactional and is trying to move the visitor toward a purchase or service-order flow. The observed page does not by itself prove phishing or malware distribution, but users should still verify who operates the service and what happens after signup, payment, or account linkage. No high-confidence explicit red flags were returned by the model in this run; caution is still warranted where verification gaps exist. Caution Points Treat the page as a commercial offer: verify pricing, refund rules, payment handling, and dispute options before paying. Read the available privacy or policy pages to understand liability, support scope, and what data the operator says it collects. Contact transparency appears limited, so treat support and dispute recovery as uncertain until independently verified. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M04 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is configured , and DMARC is configured . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates 24 year(s) based on whois . Archive continuity suggests archive continuity could not be verified in this run . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is CLEAN . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #12031 , and visible transparency signals are limited for contact details and present for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is safe with a trust score of 100/100 . Primary classification from this run: safe with score 100/100 in social media (user profiles). Conclusion: Evidence currently leans toward legitimate operation, but routine verification should still be applied. Users can engage with the MUBI community by creating profiles and sharing their film ratings and reviews. It s a safe platform for film enthusiasts to explore curated content.

• [DOMAIN AGE] The domain is 8812 days old, indicating a long-standing presence.
• [SPF RECORD] The presence of SPF records indicates proper email authentication measures.
• [DMARC RECORD] The presence of DMARC records enhances email security and legitimacy.
• [ARCHIVE GAP] The archive gap is not applicable, suggesting consistent content availability.

• The user profile is hosted on the official MUBI domain.
• Title references MUBI
• MUBI appears repeatedly in visible page text (28 mentions)
• Page links repeatedly to expected brand domain mubi.com

Is mubi.com/en/users/5788446 a scam?

ScamMinder's automated checks on September 22, 2026 rated mubi.com/en/users/5788446 Low Risk, 100/100. They did not establish a scam. No significant risk indicators were found.

Is mubi.com/en/users/5788446 safe?

ScamMinder's automated checks on September 22, 2026 found no significant risk indicators and rated mubi.com/en/users/5788446 Low Risk, 100/100. A rating is an automated opinion, not a guarantee.

What is the trust score of mubi.com/en/users/5788446?

mubi.com/en/users/5788446 has a ScamMinder trust score of 100/100 (Low Risk) from automated checks on September 22, 2026. The score is a trust index built from the evidence we could observe, not a probability.