← Back to Home

Is melonity.gg/dota2/profile Risky? 55/100 Trust Score

Website: melonity.gg/dota2/profile

Screenshot of melonity.gg/dota2/profile

Safety Score

55/100
Risky

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Gaming
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is melonity.gg/dota2/profile Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose melonity.gg/dota2/profile was analyzed as a Gaming website with Account Management characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 55/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 55/100 in Gaming (Account Management). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 221 characters. Supplementary coverage included 0 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are limited , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: Domain age is 1907 days, indicating some level of establishment but not extensive longevity. | SSL is valid, providing a layer of security for user data. | VirusTotal scan shows 0 malicious reports, suggesting no current harmful activity.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: Missing contact information | No accessible contact details found | Evidence: homepage Finding: Missing terms of service | No terms of service available | Evidence: homepage Finding: Missing privacy policy | No privacy policy available | Evidence: homepage Finding: Lack of SPF and DMARC records | Indicates potential email spoofing risks | Evidence: DNS records Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Contact transparency appears limited; avoid high-risk actions until accountable support channels are confirmed. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: R13 ), VirusTotal reports 0/94 detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 5 year(s) based on ct_logs . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #279764 , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution and verify the platform s legitimacy before providing personal information.

Risk Assessment: warning
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Missing contact information | No accessible contact details found | Evidence: homepage
  • [TERMS] Missing terms of service | No terms of service available | Evidence: homepage
  • [PRIVACY] Missing privacy policy | No privacy policy available | Evidence: homepage
  • [EMAIL_SECURITY] Lack of SPF and DMARC records | Indicates potential email spoofing risks | Evidence: DNS records
  • [LOGIN_SURFACE] High-risk path detected | Login surface is present but lacks security assurances | Evidence: login page
πŸ“Š Analysis Reasons:
  • [DOMAIN_AGE] Domain age is 1907 days, indicating some level of establishment but not extensive longevity.
  • [SSL] SSL is valid, providing a layer of security for user data.
  • [VIRUSTOTAL] VirusTotal scan shows 0 malicious reports, suggesting no current harmful activity.
  • [SPF_DMAR] The site lacks SPF and DMARC records, which are important for email security and legitimacy.
  • [CONTACT_TRANSPARENCY] There is no contact information, privacy policy, or terms of service available, raising transparency concerns.
Score Source: openai
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details