โ† Back to Home

Is m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 Legit o

Website: m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670

Screenshot of m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670

Safety Score How we score โ†’

70/100
Some Caution

Limited evidence or minor risk indicators. Review the details below.

Automated checks on September 22, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, operator contact details, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.

First analyzed Sep 22, 2026 ยท Updated Sep 22, 2026

Think this is wrong? Dispute this verdict โ€” free.

Why this score

  • Limited evidence or minor risk indicators. Review the details below.
  • Automated checks on September 22, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, operator contact details, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.
Final score
70/100
Canonical published score used on the public result page.
Final status
Some Caution
Published backend status from the canonical read model.
Raw AI score
55/100
Content-review score before canonical guardrails and publication checks.
Confidence
Medium
Confidence attached to the published canonical outcome.
Positive signals
  • DOMAIN AGE 5 years old, indicating some level of establishment.
  • SSL VALID The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Contact & Legal Signals Confirmed | Contact and legal signals were confirmed from captured pages.
  • Contact information provided on the site.
Caution signals
  • SUSPICIOUS SCRIPT Potential credential/session exfiltration path detected | Evidence: script risks
Evidence summary
Confidence: Medium
Evidence state: Known
Review status: None

AI Analysis Results

Category: e-commerce
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose The analyzed page was the /category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 path rather than the homepage, so this report is anchored to that specific page experience. The scraped title was ์‹ ๋ฐœ - ์ˆฒ๋ชฐ . The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: online shopping. Visible on-page text referenced ์‹ ์ƒ ๋ฒ ์ŠคํŠธ ์Šˆ์ฆˆ ์Šพ์‹น๋ฐฐ์†ก๐Ÿšš ์‹ ๋ฐœ -์ •๋ ฌ๋ฐฉ์‹- ์‹ ์ƒํ’ˆ ์ƒํ’ˆ๋ช… ๋‚ฎ์€๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋†’์€๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ธ๊ธฐ์ƒํ’ˆ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ›„๊ธฐ ๋ชฉ๋กํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๊ธฐ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๊ธฐ ๊ฐค๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๊ธฐ ํ™•๋Œ€๋ณด๊ธฐ [๋ถˆ๊ณฐ๋งˆ์ผ“] ์•„๋””๋‹ค์Šค ์Šคํƒ ์Šค๋ฏธ์Šค ์šด๋™ํ™” CS ID2040(ADSB5AS050) 109,000 37% 67,830 [๋ถˆ๊ณฐ๋งˆ์ผ“] ์•„๋””๋‹ค์Šค ํด๋ผ์ด๋งˆ์›œ ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ HP6692 HP6693(ADSB5AS022) 119,900 14% 102,500. . The content appears aimed at general consumers. In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with e-commerce and retail characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The requested page path /category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 was preserved during scraping, so this review reflects that specific page rather than a generic homepage substitute. The scraped title was ์‹ ๋ฐœ - ์ˆฒ๋ชฐ , which gives a direct signal about what the page presents to visitors. The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: online shopping. The page appears aimed at general consumers. No additional internal page content was needed for a baseline view of the visible experience. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were present and policy signals were present . Additional observed context from the analysis included: DOMAIN_AGE 5 years old, indicating some level of establishment | SSL_VALID The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections | CONTACT_TRANSPARENCY Contact information is available, including an email and phone number. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content does not, from visible page content alone, show a clear phishing or malware-delivery workflow. Those observed behaviors do not prove fraud by themselves, but they do increase the importance of validating operator identity, payment safety, and account-handling practices before trusting the service. Finding: SUSPICIOUS_SCRIPT Potential credential/session exfiltration path detected | Evidence: script risks Finding: SPF_MISSING No SPF record found, which is a security concern. Finding: DMARC_MISSING No DMARC record found, indicating potential email spoofing risks. Caution Points Read the available privacy or policy pages to understand liability, support scope, and what data the operator says it collects. Test the listed support channel with a low-risk question before any irreversible payment or account action. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: YR2 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates 5 year(s) based on rdap_phase_a . Archive continuity suggests archive continuity could not be verified in this run . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is CLEAN . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #1006346 , and visible transparency signals are present for contact details and present for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is safe with a trust score of 70/100 . Primary classification from this run: safe with score 70/100 in e-commerce (retail). Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Verify the legitimacy of the site before making any purchases, especially due to the lack of SPF and DMARC records.

Risk Assessment: Some Caution
โš ๏ธ Red Flags:
  • SUSPICIOUS_SCRIPT Potential credential/session exfiltration path detected | Evidence: script risks
  • SPF_MISSING No SPF record found, which is a security concern.
  • DMARC_MISSING No DMARC record found, indicating potential email spoofing risks.
๐Ÿ“Š Analysis Reasons:
  • DOMAIN_AGE 5 years old, indicating some level of establishment.
  • SSL_VALID The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
  • THREAT_INTEL No known threats or malicious activity detected.
  • SUSPICIOUS_SCRIPT Potential credential/session exfiltration path detected.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Contact & Legal Signals Confirmed | Contact and legal signals were confirmed from captured pages.
๐Ÿข Brand Evidence:
  • Contact information provided on the site.
  • Soup Mall appears repeatedly in visible page text (4 mentions)
  • Page presents product/pricing/FAQ/team style brand sections

What we could not check

  • Email authentication (SPF/DMARC): not published

Frequently asked questions about m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670

Is m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 a scam?

ScamMinder's automated checks on September 22, 2026 rated m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 Some Caution, 70/100. They did not establish a scam. Review the details before relying on it.

Is m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 safe?

ScamMinder rated m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 Some Caution, 70/100, on September 22, 2026. Limited evidence or minor risk indicators. Review the details below.

What is the trust score of m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670?

m.soupmall.co.kr/category/%EC%8B%A0%EB%B0%9C/6670 has a ScamMinder trust score of 70/100 (Some Caution) from automated checks on September 22, 2026. The score is a trust index built from the evidence we could observe, not a probability.

Verdict history

  • โ€” Low Risk (automated reanalysis)

Domain timeline

Dated facts about this domain, each with its source. The timeline is not part of the score.

  1. โ€” Analysed by ScamMinder (automated reanalysis) ยท ScamMinder analyses

Sources: ScamMinder analyses.

Technical Details

Domain Age: 5 years (2162 days)
TLS Certificate: Valid ยท issued by YR2 (DV) ยท expires in 68 days
Hosting: AS4766 Korea Telecom (KR)

IP address data powered by IPinfo

Email authentication: SPF missing ยท DMARC missing