Is github.com/MohsenBg/bgscan Legit or a Scam? Trust Score 1

No significant risk indicators found in our automated checks.

Automated checks on September 22, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.

First analyzed Sep 22, 2026 · Updated Sep 22, 2026

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://github.com/MohsenBg/bgscan Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose The analyzed page was the /MohsenBg/bgscan path rather than the homepage, so this report is anchored to that specific page experience. The scraped title was GitHub - MohsenBg/bgscan: bgscan is multi‑protocol scanner with a modular chained engine and interactive BubbleTea terminal UI. · GitHub . The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Hosting and collaboration for software development. Visible on-page text referenced GitHub - MohsenBg/bgscan: bgscan is multi‑protocol scanner with a modular chained engine and interactive BubbleTea terminal UI. . The content appears aimed at Developers, software teams, open source contributors. In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with Development Platform and Open Source characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The requested page path /MohsenBg/bgscan was preserved during scraping, so this review reflects that specific page rather than a generic homepage substitute. The scraped title was GitHub - MohsenBg/bgscan: bgscan is multi‑protocol scanner with a modular chained engine and interactive BubbleTea terminal UI. · GitHub , which gives a direct signal about what the page presents to visitors. The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Hosting and collaboration for software development. The page appears aimed at Developers, software teams, open source contributors. Supplementary review also reached 1 internal page(s), which helped confirm policy/contact material beyond the first page. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were present and policy signals were present . Additional observed context from the analysis included: The domain is 6923 days old, indicating a long-standing presence | The SSL certificate is valid, ensuring secure connections | The domain has a valid SPF record, indicating proper email authentication setup. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content does not, from visible page content alone, show a clear phishing or malware-delivery workflow. The observed page does not by itself prove phishing or malware distribution, but users should still verify who operates the service and what happens after signup, payment, or account linkage. No high-confidence explicit red flags were returned by the model in this run; caution is still warranted where verification gaps exist. Caution Points Read the available privacy or policy pages to understand liability, support scope, and what data the operator says it collects. Test the listed support channel with a low-risk question before any irreversible payment or account action. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV E36 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is configured , and DMARC is configured . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates 18 year(s) based on rdap_phase_a . Archive continuity suggests archive continuity could not be verified in this run . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is CLEAN . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #29 , and visible transparency signals are present for contact details and present for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is safe with a trust score of 100/100 . Primary classification from this run: safe with score 100/100 in Development Platform (Open Source). Conclusion: Evidence currently leans toward legitimate operation, but routine verification should still be applied. Users can confidently explore and contribute to bgscan, ensuring to follow best practices for security and collaboration.

• [DOMAIN AGE] The domain is 6923 days old, indicating a long-standing presence.
• [SPF RECORD] The domain has a valid SPF record, indicating proper email authentication setup.
• [DMARC RECORD] The presence of a DMARC record enhances email security.
• [TRUSTED PLATFORM] The project is hosted on GitHub, a reputable platform for open-source projects.

Is github.com/MohsenBg/bgscan a scam?

ScamMinder's automated checks on September 22, 2026 rated github.com/MohsenBg/bgscan Low Risk, 100/100. They did not establish a scam. No significant risk indicators were found.

Is github.com/MohsenBg/bgscan safe?

ScamMinder's automated checks on September 22, 2026 found no significant risk indicators and rated github.com/MohsenBg/bgscan Low Risk, 100/100. A rating is an automated opinion, not a guarantee.

What is the trust score of github.com/MohsenBg/bgscan?

github.com/MohsenBg/bgscan has a ScamMinder trust score of 100/100 (Low Risk) from automated checks on September 22, 2026. The score is a trust index built from the evidence we could observe, not a probability.